he Rise and Fall of the Songhay Empire of West Africa - Power, Faith, Trade and Learning on the Middle Niger, c. 1000–1612 – Dr. Rahul S. Kharat
The Rise and Fall of the Songhay Empire of West Africa - Power, Faith, Trade and Learning on the Middle Niger, c. 1000–1612 – Dr. Rahul S. Kharat
Abstract
The Songhay Empire (c. 1464–1591) was the largest state
in the history of West Africa's Sahel and, for roughly a century, one of the
most prosperous polities in the Muslim world's southern frontier. Rising from a
small riverine kingdom centred on Gao, it grew under Sonni Ali (r. 1464–1492)
into a formidable military power and under Askia Muhammad (r. 1493–1528) into a
bureaucratic, Islamic empire that controlled the middle Niger, the great
entrepôts of Timbuktu and Jenne, and the southern termini of the trans-Saharan
caravan routes. This article reconstructs the empire's origins, its expansion,
its institutions and its intellectual life, and then examines its collapse
after the Moroccan invasion of 1591. It argues that Songhay's fall cannot be
explained by a single cause. Firearms gave the Moroccan expedition a decisive
tactical advantage, but the empire had been weakened beforehand by recurrent
succession crises, the fragility of its provincial loyalties, and a dependence
on a small number of commercial and fiscal arteries. The article also reflects
on the sources on which our knowledge rests, notably the two Timbuktu
chronicles, whose authors wrote from particular political and religious
standpoints, and on the legacy of Songhay in the cultural memory of the Sahel
and the wider world.
Keywords: Songhay; Sonni Ali; Askia Muhammad; Gao; Timbuktu; Jenne; trans-Saharan
trade; Sahel; Morocco; Battle of Tondibi; Islamic scholarship
1. Introduction
In the sixteenth century a traveller moving
south across the Sahara would, after weeks of sand and stone, reach the great
bend of the River Niger and find there one of the largest states then existing
anywhere in Africa. Its rulers, the Askias, governed from Gao, an old river
port on the eastern arc of the bend. Their authority reached across the Niger
valley to the walled commercial town of Jenne in the south-west, to the
desert-edge city of Timbuktu in the north, and, in varying degrees of
effectiveness, to salt mines, oases and tributary chiefdoms hundreds of
kilometres beyond. Merchants brought gold from the forests and river valleys to
the south, and carried away salt, cloth, copper and horses. Scholars in
Timbuktu copied and debated texts of Maliki law, grammar and theology. The
empire's cavalry and its fleet of river canoes were respected from the Mossi
plateau to the Hausa towns.
Within the space of a single lifetime the
picture changed. In March 1591 an army of roughly four thousand men sent across
the Sahara by the sultan of Morocco defeated a Songhay host many times its size
at Tondibi, a short distance north of Gao. The empire never recovered. Its
capital was sacked, its leading scholars were arrested and deported, and its
provinces fragmented into smaller states and rival camps. By the early
seventeenth century what had been the Songhay Empire had become a patchwork: a
Moroccan-founded garrison state in the river towns, a Songhay remnant in the
south-east, and a reassertion of Tuareg, Fulani and Bambara power in the
surrounding country.
The story of Songhay's rise and fall has long
fascinated historians for several reasons. It is a case study in how a
river-based polity of modest origins can build an empire through a combination
of military innovation, administrative skill and the exploitation of
long-distance trade. It illustrates the interplay between indigenous religious
traditions and the Islam of literate scholars, and the uses to which rulers put
religion as an instrument of legitimacy. It is also an early example, in the
history of the African interior, of the encounter between horse-and-spear
warfare and gunpowder, a theme that would recur in many later conquests.
Finally, because Songhay sits at the junction of the Sahara, the Mediterranean
and the forest zone, it forces us to treat West Africa not as an isolated space
but as part of a connected world.
This article proceeds in broadly
chronological order. After a discussion of sources and historiography (Section
2), it examines the geography and earliest history of the Songhay people
(Section 3) and the long period during which Gao was first an independent
kingdom and then a dependency of the Empire of Mali (Section 4). Sections 5 and
6 treat the two great rulers, Sonni Ali and Askia Muhammad. Section 7 analyses
the empire's government, army, economy and social order, and Section 8 its
intellectual life. Sections 9 to 11 trace the decline of the sixteenth century,
the Moroccan invasion and its immediate consequences. Section 12 weighs
competing explanations for the fall, Section 13 discusses legacy and memory,
and Section 14 concludes.
2. Sources and
Historiography
Any account of Songhay rests on a relatively
small body of written evidence, supplemented by archaeology, oral tradition and
the testimony of outsiders. Understanding the character of these sources is
essential to understanding the debates that surround the empire.
2.1 The Timbuktu chronicles
The two principal narrative sources are the Ta'rikh
al-Sudan (History of the Sudan) and the Ta'rikh al-fattash
(Chronicle of the Seeker). The first was composed around the middle of the
seventeenth century by 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sa'di, who was born in Timbuktu in
1594, three years after the Moroccan conquest, and who served as a scholar and
official in the city under the new Moroccan-descended ruling class (Hunwick
1999; Houdas 1900). Al-Sa'di's work provides a continuous narrative from the
legendary origins of the Songhay kings down to the 1650s, with the sixteenth
century treated in greatest detail. It is written in classical Arabic, in a
tradition of Islamic chronicle writing that favours the deeds of rulers, the
careers of scholars and the moral lessons that can be drawn from them.
The Ta'rikh al-fattash has a more
complicated history. For many decades it was attributed to Mahmud Kati, a
Timbuktu scholar born in the later fifteenth century who lived through the
reign of Askia Muhammad. The French editors Octave Houdas and Maurice Delafosse
published it in 1913 on that assumption (Houdas and Delafosse 1913). Subsequent
research, above all by Nehemia Levtzion and John Hunwick, has shown that the
text as we have it was substantially compiled or revised in the later
seventeenth century by a member of a Kati-related family, using earlier notes
but also adding interpolations that reflect the political concerns of the later
period (Levtzion 1971; Hunwick 1999). This does not render it useless, but it
means that its claims, for instance about the religious status of Askia
Muhammad, must be read as arguments as well as reports.
Both chronicles share a perspective. Their
authors were literate Muslim scholars from Timbuktu who regarded Islamic
learning and Islamic rule as the measure of civilisation. They looked back on
the Askia dynasty with admiration and on its predecessor, the Sonni dynasty,
with considerable ambivalence. It follows that the image of Sonni Ali as an
oppressor of scholars and a half-pagan sorcerer, familiar in textbooks, is in
significant part the product of the point of view of the chroniclers rather
than a neutral description.
2.2 Other written,
archaeological and oral evidence
Arabic geographers and travellers supply
earlier and complementary information. The eleventh-century Andalusian
geographer al-Bakri describes a town called Kawkaw, generally identified with
Gao, with a Muslim ruler and a dual urban structure, while Ibn Battuta, who
travelled in the Mali Empire in the 1350s, mentions Gao as a significant
commercial town (Levtzion and Hopkins 1981). For the sixteenth century the
single most vivid outside witness is al-Hasan ibn Muhammad al-Wazzan, known in
Europe as Leo Africanus, a Granada-born Moroccan who visited the region around
1510 and again a few years later, and who later composed a famous description
of Africa in Italy (Leo Africanus 1896). His comments on the wealth of the
court, the book trade of Timbuktu and the prosperity of the merchants are among
the best-known passages in the literature, though they too must be read with an
awareness of his purposes and his limited stay.
Archaeology has transformed our understanding
of the region's deeper past. Excavations at Gao and at the royal cemetery of
Gao-Saney have shown that the town was already a significant settlement in the
first millennium and that it had Muslim residents and imported goods by the
eleventh and twelfth centuries (Insoll 1996, 2003). Work in the inland delta of
the Niger by Susan and Roderick McIntosh has revealed the early urban tradition
of Jenne-jeno and the long history of settled life on which the later empire
drew (McIntosh 1998). Epigraphic studies of the tombstones of Gao-Saney, many
of them carved in Spain and shipped across the Sahara, have given historians a
rare view of eleventh- and twelfth-century elites (Moraes Farias 2003).
Finally, oral traditions among the Songhay and
Zarma, collected most systematically by the French ethnologist Jean Rouch and
later by Jean-Pierre Olivier de Sardan, preserve a different memory of the
past. In them Sonni Ali often appears as a heroic and spiritually powerful
figure rather than a villain (Rouch 1953; Olivier de Sardan 1984). The contrast
between oral memory and written chronicle is one of the most productive
tensions in Songhay studies.
2.3 Changing
interpretations
Older European scholarship, such as E. W.
Bovill's popular The Golden Trade of the Moors, tended to treat Songhay
as an episode in a story of Islamic civilisation filtering southward from North
Africa (Bovill 1958). The decolonising generation of historians, including
Sékéné Mody Cissoko and others writing in the General History of Africa,
emphasised instead the indigenous roots of the state and the agency of its
rulers (Cissoko 1975, 1984). More recent work has become more critical of the
sources, more attentive to the regional diversity of the empire, and more
interested in themes such as slavery, race and the relationship between
religion and political power (Hunwick 1996; Lovejoy 2012; Hall 2011; Gomez
2018). That is the tradition within which the present article stands.
3. The River, the Land and
the People: Origins of Songhay
3.1 The environment of the
Niger Bend
The history of Songhay is inseparable from
the River Niger. Rising in the highlands near the Atlantic, the Niger flows
north-east into the Sahel, where it spreads into a vast inland delta before
curving eastward past Timbuktu and Gao and then turning south-east towards what
is now Niger and Nigeria. This Niger Bend is a zone of striking ecological
contrasts. To the north lies the Sahara, whose caravan routes converged on the
river's northern edge. To the south lie savanna and cultivable land where
millet, sorghum and rice could be grown. In the middle is the river itself: a
highway for boats, a source of fish, and a seasonal floodplain whose annual
rise and fall allowed intensive cultivation.
This setting shaped the political economy of
the peoples who lived there. Whoever controlled the river could move soldiers
and goods rapidly and tax the movement of others. Whoever controlled the points
at which the river met the desert, such as Gao, Timbuktu and the markets of the
delta, could profit from the exchange of Saharan salt and Mediterranean goods
for the gold, kola, grain and captives of the south.
3.2 The Songhay people
The Songhay speak a language that linguists
regard as the principal member of a distinct family, whose broader affiliations
remain debated. Their society, as described in the ethnographic literature,
incorporated several occupational and ritual groups. The sorko were
fishers and boatmen who commanded the river and whose ritual specialists were
associated with the spirits of the water. The gow were hunters.
Alongside them were farmers and, in later periods, a stratum of warrior
aristocrats and enslaved dependants (Rouch 1953; Olivier de Sardan 1984). The
river specialists were especially important in military terms: the capacity to
build and man large numbers of boats gave the Songhay rulers a mobility that
their land-bound rivals could not easily match.
Religious life before and alongside Islam was
centred on spirits associated with the river, with ancestors and with natural
forces, mediated by priests and spirit mediums. These traditions did not
disappear when Islam spread among the elite and the towns. On the contrary,
throughout the period discussed in this article, ancestral religion and Islam
co-existed, intermingled and sometimes competed, and the relationship between
them was one of the central political issues of the empire.
3.3 Gao and the first kings
According to al-Sa'di, the earliest rulers of
the Songhay were a dynasty called the Za, whose seat was at Kukiya, downriver
from Gao, and whose first king came, in legend, from the Yemeni east. The
fourteenth or fifteenth of these rulers, Za Kosoi, is said to have embraced
Islam around the year 1009–1010 (Hunwick 1999). The legendary details need not
be taken literally, but the broad claim that Islam was present at the Songhay
court by the early eleventh century is consistent with al-Bakri's description
and with the archaeological evidence at Gao-Saney (Levtzion and Hopkins 1981;
Insoll 1996).
Gao in these centuries was a trading town of
increasing importance. It lay at the end of one of the main routes across the
central Sahara and at a place where goods could be transferred from camel to
canoe. Its rulers drew revenue from commerce and probably from tribute
collected from neighbouring communities. Islam in this period was largely the
religion of merchants, court officials and some of the ruling family, while the
great majority of the population followed older practices. This pattern, an
Islamic crown and commercial class set within a largely non-Muslim agrarian
society, would persist and would eventually frame the controversies of the
Askia period.
4. Between Mali and
Independence (c. 1300–1464)
4.1 Gao within the Empire
of Mali
The thirteenth and fourteenth centuries
belonged to the Empire of Mali, the Mande-led state whose most famous ruler,
Mansa Musa, made his celebrated pilgrimage to Mecca in 1324–1325. According to
al-Sa'di, Gao came under Malian authority in the early fourteenth century, when
a general of Mansa Musa took the city (Hunwick 1999; Levtzion 1973). The
Songhay rulers were not extinguished, but they were reduced to the status of
vassals, and members of the royal family were held at the Malian court as
hostages.
This episode is crucial to the later story.
Sa'di recounts that two brothers of the Songhay royal line, Ali Kolon and
Sulayman Nar, escaped from the Malian court and returned to Songhay, where they
founded what the chronicles call the Sonni dynasty, perhaps in the 1330s
(Hunwick 1999). The details of the story may be embroidered, but its function
is clear. It explains the origin of a ruling house whose identity was defined
in opposition to Mali, and it dates the beginning of Songhay's emergence as a
power in its own right.
4.2 The weakening of Mali
After the death of Mansa Sulayman in 1360,
Mali was shaken by disputed successions, provincial revolts and external
pressure. The Tuareg of the desert edge, long a force in the region, seized
Timbuktu in the 1430s, and further north the oasis of Walata passed under
shifting control. The Mossi kingdoms of the southern savanna raided the Niger
valley, and Mali's own heartland on the upper Niger was increasingly distracted
by rivals. The vacuum thus created offered opportunities to ambitious neighbours.
The Sonni rulers of Gao exploited those
opportunities in a patient and opportunistic way. By the middle of the
fifteenth century Songhay had become effectively independent, with an army and
a river fleet capable of campaigning along the Niger and into the surrounding
country. The final surge came with the accession of Sonni Ali, in about 1464, a
ruler who would transform a regional kingdom into an empire.
5. Sonni Ali: Warrior-King
and Empire-Builder (1464–1492)
5.1 The seizure of Timbuktu
and Jenne
Sonni Ali, often called Ali Ber ("Ali
the Great"), is among the most striking figures in West African history.
The chronicles portray him as a ruler of extraordinary energy who spent most of
his reign in the field, campaigning against the Tuareg, Fulani, Mossi and Dogon
and against the remnants of Malian power. His principal achievements were
military and logistical. He built up a cavalry arm, but more significantly he
exploited the Niger itself, deploying large flotillas of boats to move troops
and to surround or blockade river towns.
In 1468 Sonni Ali captured Timbuktu from the
Tuareg, who had controlled the city for about three decades. The chronicles
describe the event in dark terms: the Tuareg governor fled, and Sonni Ali's
soldiers are said to have plundered the city and killed or driven out many of
the scholars and notables, particularly those associated with the Sankore
district whom he suspected of collaborating with the Tuareg (Hunwick 1999; Saad
1983). We should treat these accounts cautiously. The scholars of Timbuktu were
the ancestors of the chroniclers' own families, and the memory of persecution
may have been both real and politically convenient. What is clear is that Sonni
Ali's relationship with the Muslim clerical elite of Timbuktu was strained and
that many scholars withdrew from the city for a time.
The conquest of Jenne, the great market town
on the inland delta, took longer. According to tradition the town resisted a
siege of seven years, though that figure has a ritual ring and may be an
exaggeration; the city fell in the early 1470s (Hunwick 1999). Jenne was of the
highest value. It stood at the junction between the gold-bearing regions of the
south and the caravan routes to the north, and its markets supplied Timbuktu
with grain and goods. By holding both Timbuktu and Jenne, with the river
joining them, Sonni Ali controlled the two principal nodes of the western
Sudanese economy.
5.2 Warfare and statecraft
Beyond the two great cities Sonni Ali
campaigned continuously. He pushed Songhay authority north towards Walata,
repelled the Mossi who had raided the river towns, attacked the Dogon on the
cliffs of Bandiagara, and fought the Fulani of the south-east. He did not
attempt to impose a uniform administration on all these regions. Rather, he
relied on a combination of garrisons, loyal governors, tribute demands and
punitive expeditions. Historians have described the resulting structure as an
empire in the sense of a multi-layered system of domination rather than a
seamless territorial state (Gomez 2018).
Sonni Ali also organised the economic basis
of his power. The chronicles credit him with establishing estates worked by
enslaved people, which supplied grain to the army and the court, and with
controlling the river trade by means of his fleet. Historians of slavery have
noted that these arrangements anticipated what the Askias would later
systematise, and that the use of enslaved labour on royal estates was an
important feature of Songhay's political economy (Lovejoy 2012).
5.3 Religion and reputation
The portrait of Sonni Ali in the chronicles
is dominated by his religious ambiguity. He is said to have publicly professed
Islam, to have taken part in some Muslim observances, and yet to have continued
to consult diviners, make sacrifices and rely on the spiritual specialists of
the river. For the Timbuktu authors, who equated proper rule with strict
observance of Islamic law, this was damning. Modern scholars read the evidence
differently. Some have argued that Sonni Ali pursued a deliberate policy of
balance, recognising that most of his subjects were not committed Muslims and
that the clerical elite of Timbuktu could be a threat to his authority (Hunwick
1966; Kaba 1984). Others stress that the later hostility to him was amplified
by the success of the Askia dynasty, which needed to justify its seizure of the
throne.
In either case, Sonni Ali's reign laid the
foundations of empire. He broke the power of the Tuareg in the Niger Bend,
neutralised the Mossi threat, captured the great commercial towns, and created
a military machine that his successor would turn to different ends. He died in
1492 on the way back from a campaign; the circumstances are variously reported.
His son, Sonni Baru, succeeded him, but his reign would be extremely short.
6. Askia Muhammad and the
Islamic Turn (1493–1528)
6.1 The coup of 1493
Muhammad Ture, the founder of the Askia
dynasty, was one of Sonni Ali's senior commanders. The chronicles describe him
as being of Soninke origin through his father and as having a Songhay mother,
and as having served in the army of the old king before emerging as the leader
of a movement against his son (Hunwick 1999). On 12 April 1493, at the battle
of Anfao, his forces defeated those of Sonni Baru. Sonni Baru withdrew with his
followers to the south-east, to the Ayorou region on the Niger, and the Sonni
line was never again a serious claimant to the throne.
The title "Askia," which Muhammad
adopted, has a famous etymology in the chronicles. According to one tale, Sonni
Baru's sister, upon seeing Muhammad Ture seize power, exclaimed a Songhay
phrase that the chroniclers rendered as an expression of denial, and this was
transformed into the dynastic title (Hunwick 1999). Whatever the truth of the
anecdote, the title became the label of a dynasty and, in the historiography,
of an age.
Later authors presented the coup as a triumph
of Islam over paganism and of learned clerics over a persecutor. This view is
deeply embedded in the sources, but it should not be accepted without
qualification. Lansiné Kaba has argued that the events of 1493 were a political
revolution with religious language, driven by a coalition of the Muslim elite,
ambitious military commanders and aggrieved provincial groups, and that the
religious dimension, though real, was only one of several (Kaba 1984). Hunwick
likewise emphasised that Sonni Ali's own Islamic profession should not be
dismissed (Hunwick 1966, 1996).
6.2 The pilgrimage and the
quest for legitimacy
A usurper needs legitimacy, and Askia
Muhammad sought it in the most prestigious way open to a Muslim ruler: the
pilgrimage to Mecca. In 1496–1497 he travelled to the Hijaz with a large
retinue, accompanied by scholars and an armed escort, and with large quantities
of gold, much of which he is reported to have distributed in charity and in the
foundation of an endowment or hostel for West African pilgrims (Hunwick 1999).
On his journey he passed through Cairo and visited the holy cities, where,
according to al-Sa'di, he was recognised by the local religious authorities and
invested with the title of caliph for the lands of the Sudan.
The precise details of this investiture have
been questioned by historians, and the title's practical significance was
modest. But the symbolic effect was substantial. The journey connected Songhay
to the Muslim heartlands in a very visible way, advertised the wealth of the
new ruler, and gave him a body of scholarly contacts that he could use at home.
It also confirmed that the Askias would rule as Muslim kings in a way that the
Sonni rulers had not claimed.
6.3 Al-Maghili and the
Replies
During the 1490s Askia Muhammad consulted the
North African scholar Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Karim al-Maghili, a Maliki jurist of
Tlemcen origin who had campaigned vigorously for strict Islamic practice in the
oases of the Sahara and who is remembered for his hostility to Jewish
communities in Tuat (Hunwick 1985b). Al-Maghili travelled in the region and, in
response to the ruler's questions, composed a set of legal opinions known as
the Replies (Hunwick 1985a).
These documents reveal the kind of problems
that the new king wished to settle. How should a Muslim ruler deal with
subjects who mixed Islam with older practices? What was the status of diviners
and spirit-mediums? Which taxes were lawful? Could Muslims be enslaved? Under
what conditions could war be waged against neighbouring peoples? Al-Maghili's
answers were uncompromising: a ruler was bound to uphold the shari'a, to
suppress practices he considered unlawful innovations, and to wage war on those
who rejected Islam, and he condemned the enslavement of free Muslims while
permitting the enslavement of non-Muslims in certain circumstances.
How far Askia Muhammad followed this advice
is another question. Hunwick has shown that the Askia's policy was in practice
more pragmatic than the Replies might suggest (Hunwick 1985a, 1996). He
supported the scholars, appointed qadis (judges) and patronised mosques, but he
did not attempt to eradicate older religious practices from the countryside,
and the mass of the population continued to follow them. In this way the Askia
state combined an Islamic idiom of rule in the towns with a pragmatic tolerance
elsewhere.
6.4 Conquest and
consolidation
Once established, Askia Muhammad devoted
decades to enlarging and securing his dominions. The chronicles record
expeditions against the Mossi, whom he treated as pagans and against whom he
declared a jihad, against remnants of Malian authority to the west, against the
Fulani, and against the Tuareg and Berber communities of the Sahara. About 1500
his forces took Agadez and the Aïr region, a vital node in the routes linking
the Niger Bend to the Hausa states and the central Sahara. In the east he
extended his influence into Hausaland, where the rulers of Katsina and Kano
acknowledged his suzerainty, at least nominally, for a time (Hunwick 1985c).
This eastern expansion did not last. The
kingdom of Kebbi, under its energetic ruler Kanta, broke away around 1516–1517
and defeated Songhay armies, and Songhay authority in Hausaland effectively
collapsed (Hunwick 1985c). This episode is a useful reminder that the empire's
reach exceeded its grasp. The Askias were able to project power across great
distances, but they could not impose permanent administration on every region
that submitted to them, and the periphery of the empire was always liable to
reassert its independence.
6.5 The end of a long reign
Askia Muhammad ruled for thirty-five years.
In his old age he became blind and frail, and in 1528 he was deposed by his own
son Musa, in a coup that foreshadowed later conflicts. He lived on, in
confinement and then in retirement, until 1538, when he died at an advanced age
and was buried in the monumental tomb at Gao that bears his name. That tomb, a
pyramidal earthen structure with projecting wooden beams, was inscribed on the
UNESCO World Heritage List in 2004 (UNESCO World Heritage Centre 2004).
7. Governing an Empire:
Administration, Army, Economy and Society
7.1 The structure of the
empire
Songhay is best understood as a layered
system. At its heart lay the core territories along the Niger between Gao and
Timbuktu, ruled directly from the capital. Around this core were large
provinces governed by senior officials, most of them close relatives or trusted
servants of the Askia. Beyond them were tributary states and chiefdoms that
were obliged to send gifts, goods or soldiers but which retained their own
rulers. And beyond those lay zones of raiding and influence in which the
Askia's authority was intermittent (Gomez 2018; Hunwick 1985c).
The most important provincial governors were
the Kurmina-fari, who administered the western provinces centred on the region
of Timbuktu and the river west of Gao, and the Dendi-fari, who oversaw the
south-eastern provinces. Both were typically close to the royal family and, as
a consequence, often figures in succession struggles. Timbuktu itself, a city
of great commercial and religious importance, had its own governor, the
Timbuktu-koy, and its own senior judge and notables, who enjoyed a measure of
autonomy (Saad 1983).
7.2 Offices of state
Askia Muhammad is credited by the chronicles
with creating or strengthening a series of central offices. Their titles were
Songhay, and their precise translations vary across the literature, but their
functions are reasonably clear. The balama was a senior military
commander, the principal general of the army. The hi-koy commanded the
river fleet. The fari-mondyo oversaw the agricultural estates, while the
wanei-farma administered royal property, and other officials looked after
fisheries and waterways, the treasury, the affairs of foreign merchants and the
royal household (Hunwick 1999; Cissoko 1984). Alongside these were Muslim
officials: qadis, the market inspector, and the scholars who served as advisers
and scribes.
Al-Sa'di also reports that Askia Muhammad
standardised weights and measures and appointed inspectors to oversee the
markets of the major towns (Hunwick 1999). This is consistent with the picture
of an administration that treated commerce as a source of revenue and as an
object of regulation, in a way that resembled contemporary Islamic states
elsewhere. It would be wrong, however, to imagine a bureaucracy on the scale of
a modern state. Writing was used by a small circle, and much of the work of
government was conducted through personal relationships, oral instruction and
the movement of the court.
7.3 The army and the river
fleet
Songhay's military power rested on three
elements. The first was cavalry, composed of horsemen drawn from the
aristocracy and from vassal groups. Horses were expensive and had to be
imported or bred in the drier zones, and the cavalry gave the empire a decisive
advantage in the open country of the Sahel. The second was infantry, made up of
foot soldiers armed with spears, bows and shields, who were often levied from
subject communities and from the enslaved. The third was the fleet. The sorko
boatmen and the hi-koy who commanded them could move forces swiftly along the
river and block the enemy's use of it, which gave the empire strategic mobility
that its neighbours lacked.
The army was effective against its
traditional enemies, but it had limits. It was an organisation of horsemen and
spearmen, and it depended on the loyalty of provincial commanders who could, in
a crisis, become rivals. Firearms played only a marginal role. This fact would
prove fateful in 1591.
7.4 Trade and the economy
Songhay was a commercial empire. Its
prosperity rested on its position at the southern termini of the trans-Saharan
routes. From the north came salt, the most valuable bulk commodity of the
region, mined at Taghaza in the Sahara and carried by camel; copper from mines
near Takedda; textiles; horses; and manufactured goods. From the south came
gold, which was mined in regions such as Bambuk and Bure and, later, in the
forest zone to the south-east, as well as kola nuts, grain and enslaved people
(Austen 2010; Levtzion 1973). The Songhay did not control the goldfields, which
lay outside the empire. Their wealth came from controlling the markets, the routes
and the movement of goods through them, and from taxing and tolling these
exchanges.
Leo Africanus, writing of Timbuktu, described
a city where merchants and artisans prospered, where the king maintained a rich
treasure of gold, and where the book trade was among the most profitable of its
commerce (Leo Africanus 1896). His account, like most travellers' reports, is
impressionistic, but it matches the picture given by the chronicles of a
thriving commercial society.
Agriculture was the foundation of the food
supply. Millet, sorghum, rice and other crops were grown along the river, and
the floodplain was well adapted to intensive cultivation. The Askia state
encouraged the creation of royal agricultural settlements, called hanga
in some sources, which were worked by enslaved people and which supplied the
court, the army and the officials (Lovejoy 2012). The empire thus combined a
commercial economy with an agricultural one based on coerced labour.
7.5 Slavery, race and
social hierarchy
Slavery was integral to Songhay society and
to the trade that supported it. Captives were taken in wars and raids,
particularly against non-Muslim peoples to the south, and were sold within the
empire or exported across the Sahara. Enslaved persons worked on the royal
estates, served in the army, laboured in households and, in some cases, rose to
positions of trust (Lovejoy 2012; Hall 2011). The legal framework drew on
Islamic law, which permitted the enslavement of non-Muslims but in theory
prohibited the enslavement of free Muslims, though in practice the line between
the categories was often disputed. Songhay's most famous scholar, Ahmad Baba,
would later write a treatise on the subject, which maintained that the proper
ground for enslavement was unbelief rather than race or dark skin, a position
that critiqued prevailing assumptions (Hunwick 2000).
Society was also stratified by lineage,
occupation and religion. At the apex stood the Askia and his family, followed
by officials, military commanders, scholars and merchants. Below them were
farmers, artisans and fishers, and at the bottom were the enslaved. These
categories were not wholly rigid, and individuals could move between them, but
they structured relations of power and obligation across the empire.
8. Timbuktu, Jenne and the
Culture of Learning
8.1 The scholarly city
If Gao was the political capital of Songhay,
Timbuktu was its intellectual centre. Founded as a seasonal camp by Tuareg
nomads around the twelfth century, it grew into a major commercial city and
then, under Mali and Songhay, into a centre of Islamic learning (Saad 1983).
Its famous mosques, including the Djinguereber, whose construction is
attributed to the reign of Mansa Musa, the Sankore and the Sidi Yahya, were the
focal points of a scholarly community that taught law, theology, grammar,
logic, astronomy and other subjects.
The word "university" is sometimes
used for the scholarly system of Timbuktu, but it is misleading. There was no
single institution with a fixed curriculum and formal degrees. Instead,
learning was organised around individual teachers and the circles of students
who gathered around them, often in private homes or in mosques, studying texts
on a model common to the Islamic world. The principal legal school was the
Maliki, and the foundational texts included handbooks of Maliki jurisprudence,
works of Arabic grammar and rhetoric, and commentaries (Saad 1983; Hunwick and
Boye 2008).
8.2 Families, books and
patronage
The scholarly life of Timbuktu was dominated
by a number of families, among them the Aqit, of Berber Sanhaja origin, who
produced a succession of judges and teachers. Askia Muhammad cultivated these
scholars, granted them gifts and stipends, and used them as advisers; his
respect for them was one of the principal ways in which he distinguished his
rule from that of Sonni Ali (Hunwick 1999). The judges of Timbuktu, supported
by this patronage, exercised a degree of independence and, on occasion, openly
criticised rulers.
Books were an essential element of this
culture. Manuscripts were copied by hand, traded and carefully preserved, and
private libraries were a source of status. Some books were imported from North
Africa, while others were composed locally on subjects ranging from law and
theology to astronomy, medicine and poetry. The persistence of manuscript
collections in Timbuktu and neighbouring towns into the twenty-first century,
numbering in the hundreds of thousands, though many date from later periods,
testifies to this tradition (Hunwick and Boye 2008; Hammer 2016).
8.3 Ahmad Baba and the
intellectual peak
The most celebrated scholar of the age was
Ahmad Baba al-Timbukti (1556–1627), a member of the Aqit family, who studied
under leading teachers in Timbuktu and Jenne and who produced dozens of works
on law, grammar, biography and ethics (Hunwick 1962). His reputation extended
across the Maghrib and beyond. His fate, which we shall see in Section 11,
would be bound up with the Moroccan conquest, and his career symbolises both
the heights that Timbuktu's scholarly culture reached and the vulnerability of
that culture to political upheaval.
8.4 Jenne and the wider
network
Jenne, further up the river, was not a rival
to Timbuktu but a complement. It was a city of merchants, with a distinct and
impressive urban tradition, and a centre of Islamic learning in its own right.
Its connections to the goldfields of the south and to the markets of the delta
made it a key node in the network that supplied Timbuktu. The two cities,
together with Gao, formed a triangle of commerce, administration and learning
that underpinned the empire (McIntosh 1998; Saad 1983).
9. Fractures: Succession
Crises and Provincial Strain (1528–1588)
9.1 A dynasty of brothers
Songhay's rulers faced a structural problem:
there was no firm rule of succession. In principle the throne passed within the
Askia family, but the choice among brothers, sons and nephews was often
contested. In practice, the decisive factors were the support of the senior
military officers, the provincial governors and the leading clerics, and the
capacity to move swiftly to the capital. The result was a series of palace
coups.
Askia Muhammad was deposed by his son Musa in
1528. Musa was in turn overthrown in about 1531 by his brother or cousin,
Muhammad Benkan, who was himself deposed in 1537 by Isma'il, and so on. Askia
Ishaq I (r. 1539–1549) was succeeded by Daud (r. 1549–1582/3), whose long reign
was an interlude of relative stability, though not without internal conflicts
(Hunwick 1999). The reigns of the Askias after Daud, al-Hajj II, Muhammad Bani
and Ishaq II, were brief and troubled, and were characterised by civil war.
|
Ruler |
Approximate reign |
Notes |
|
Sonni Ali |
1464–1492 |
Builder of the empire; captured Timbuktu
(1468) and Jenne (c. 1473) |
|
Sonni Baru |
1492–1493 |
Defeated at Anfao by Muhammad Ture |
|
Askia Muhammad I |
1493–1528 |
Pilgrimage 1496–97; deposed by his son |
|
Askia Musa |
1528–1531 |
Overthrown by a relative |
|
Askia Muhammad II Benkan |
1531–1537 |
Deposed |
|
Askia Isma'il |
1537–1539 |
Short reign |
|
Askia Ishaq I |
1539–1549 |
Dispute with Morocco over Taghaza begins |
|
Askia Daud |
1549–1582/3 |
Long and relatively stable reign |
|
Askia al-Hajj II |
1582/3–1586 |
Deposed |
|
Askia Muhammad III Bani |
1586–1588 |
Deposed in civil war |
|
Askia Ishaq II |
1588–1591 |
Defeated at Tondibi |
Table
1. Principal rulers of Songhay. Dates are approximate and vary slightly between
sources (after Hunwick 1999; Gomez 2018).
9.2 Why succession mattered
Each succession crisis had costs that went
beyond the immediate conflict. Rival candidates drew on the support of
provincial governors and military leaders, who were thus rewarded with greater
autonomy. Defeated factions retreated to the provinces and became centres of
opposition, or went into exile. The army's best commanders were killed or
alienated. And each change of ruler provoked doubts among tributary states and
subject peoples about the strength of the centre. Because the empire was held
together largely by personal loyalties and the threat of force, rather than by
institutions that could survive the death of a ruler, a weakening of the centre
had immediate effects on the periphery.
These crises are the reason why many
historians view the Songhay Empire as brittle, in spite of its impressive
appearance. The reign of Askia Daud shows what was possible: he restored
central authority, conducted campaigns and maintained the loyalty of the
provinces. But the structural weakness remained, and when Daud died the old
pattern resumed.
9.3 The civil war of the
1580s
The final decade before the Moroccan invasion
was marked by deep division. After Daud's death in 1582/3 his son al-Hajj II
was deposed, and the ensuing quarrels among the sons of Daud became
increasingly violent. The civil war of 1588, involving the military commander
known as the balama and various princes, split the nobility and left the
western provinces embittered. Ishaq II, who emerged as Askia in that year,
faced a country divided against itself, and some of the leading figures of the
dynasty were not reconciled to his rule (Hunwick 1999; Kaba 1981). The
chronicles report that factions at court sought support from outside, and that
the Moroccan sultan later claimed to have received an appeal from one of
Ishaq's brothers, though this claim was probably a pretext.
10. Morocco's Gambit: The
Road to Tondibi
10.1 The Saadian ambition
The enemy that destroyed Songhay came from
across the desert. The Saadian dynasty of Morocco, which had risen in the
sixteenth century in the south of the country and had driven out the Portuguese
from much of the coast, gained its greatest triumph in 1578 at the Battle of
the Three Kings (Ksar el-Kebir), in which a Portuguese army was destroyed and
King Sebastian was killed. The victory brought Ahmad al-Mansur to the throne
and the ransoms for captured Portuguese nobles provided a large treasury.
Al-Mansur was an ambitious and capable sultan with a taste for ceremony, and he
adopted the epithet al-Dhahabi, "the Golden," in later
tradition associated with the gold he extracted from the south (El Hamel 2013;
Abitbol 1979).
His motives for turning towards the Sudan
were fiscal, strategic and political. Morocco's domestic revenues, derived from
taxes and from sugar production in the Sus valley, were not enough to sustain a
large standing army and a lavish court. The Ottoman Empire, already established
in Algiers, blocked expansion to the east. The south, by contrast, appeared to
offer both gold and salt. Al-Mansur also wished to present himself as a
pre-eminent Muslim sovereign, and some of his advisers and his own rhetoric claimed
that the lands of the Sudan were rightfully subject to a legitimate Islamic
caliph (Hunwick 1962; Kaba 1981).
10.2 The dispute over
Taghaza
The immediate point of friction was Taghaza,
the salt-mining centre in the desert, whose revenues the Songhay Askias had
long collected. From the middle of the sixteenth century, as the Saadian
sultans consolidated their authority in the south of Morocco, they began to
press claims to the mines. According to al-Sa'di, when Muhammad al-Shaykh, the
first Saadian sultan to press the claim, wrote to Askia Ishaq I about the
matter, the Songhay ruler responded with a show of force, sending Tuareg riders
to raid in the Dra' valley (Hunwick 1999). Under Daud the relationship was
handled with gifts and diplomacy.
In the 1580s al-Mansur took more decisive
measures. In 1583 he annexed the oases of Tuat and Gourara, extending Moroccan
control deep into the desert and closer to the Niger. At the end of the decade,
he sent a demand to Askia Ishaq II for a share of the revenues of Taghaza. The
Askia's response was dismissive (Hunwick 1999). In 1590 al-Mansur, having
consulted his officers, many of whom regarded the enterprise as dangerous,
decided to send an expedition across the Sahara.
10.3 The expedition
The commander was Judar Pasha, a Spaniard by
birth, born in the region of Almería and captured as a boy, who had risen
through the Moroccan court to become an officer and a eunuch (Kaba 1981). The
force that left Marrakesh in October 1590 is usually estimated at about four
thousand men, though some accounts give somewhat different figures. It included
arquebusiers, light cavalry and a small number of cannon, together with
thousands of camels and horses and a large baggage train. A great many of the
soldiers were renegades, converts or Andalusian Muslim exiles, trained in the
use of firearms.
The march across the Sahara took roughly four
months and was hazardous. Judar's men passed through the salt-mining centre of
Taghaza, which was plundered and ruined in the process, and the expedition lost
men and animals to thirst and exhaustion. The Songhay were aware of the
approach, and counsellors reportedly urged the Askia to poison or block the
wells along the route and to avoid a pitched battle. But the empire had not
been prepared for an attack of this kind. The army of Ishaq II was hastily
gathered and was reported to be many times larger than the invading force. The
Moroccans reached the Niger at the end of February 1591 (Hunwick 1999; Kaba
1981).
11. Tondibi and the
Collapse (1591–1612)
11.1 The battle
The two armies met on 12 or 13 March 1591
(the sources differ) at a place near Tondibi, about fifty kilometres north of
Gao. Estimates of the size of the Songhay force vary from some twenty thousand
to as many as forty thousand or more; the chronicle of al-Sa'di gives figures
for both cavalry and infantry (Hunwick 1999). It was an army of horsemen and
spearmen, fighting in the manner in which Songhay had won its empire. Ishaq II,
reportedly hoping to use the one weapon that he could deploy against firearms,
ordered a herd of cattle to be driven towards the Moroccan lines to cause
disorder and conceal the advance of his troops.
The plan failed. The cattle, frightened by
the noise and smoke of the Moroccan guns, turned and stampeded back into the
Songhay ranks. In the confusion the Moroccan arquebusiers, firing in
disciplined volleys, cut down the infantry and broke the cavalry charges. The
battle is said to have lasted only a couple of hours. The Songhay army
scattered. It was not the numbers that had decided the contest but the
combination of firepower, discipline and shock. The Songhay had no answer to
massed firearms and had not made any systematic effort to acquire them.
11.2 The occupation of the
river towns
Judar Pasha advanced to Gao, which had
largely been evacuated, and he found the city a disappointment. There was
little treasure, and the supply situation was difficult. Askia Ishaq II offered
to buy peace with gold and slaves, and to become a tributary of Morocco, but
al-Mansur rejected the offer and demanded complete submission (Hunwick 1999).
The Moroccans then marched on Timbuktu, which they entered in April 1591, and
on Jenne, and established garrisons in the principal towns.
The conquest proved more difficult to sustain
than it had been to achieve. The Moroccan force was small, far from home and
unaccustomed to the climate and diseases of the Niger valley. Songhay
resistance did not end with Tondibi. Ishaq II, and then his successors, rallied
forces in the south-east, in the region of Dendi, and conducted a long
guerrilla campaign against the invaders, aided by the river, the climate and
the difficulty of supply (Kaba 1981). Ishaq II himself was killed in the Gurma
region, according to al-Sa'di, by local people to whom he had turned for
refuge. Judar was replaced as commander within a few years by Mahmud ibn
Zarqun, who struggled to destroy the remaining Songhay forces, and the war
continued, with interruptions, into the early seventeenth century. Kaba dates
the effective end of organised Songhay resistance to 1612.
11.3 The fate of Timbuktu
and its scholars
The Moroccan occupation was particularly
severe on Timbuktu. The city's notables had initially hoped to accommodate the
new rulers, and some did. But resentment grew, and in late 1593 a revolt or
conspiracy in the city provided the occupiers with a pretext for a crackdown.
Many of the leading scholars and merchants, among them Ahmad Baba and members
of the Aqit family, were arrested, their property seized, and their libraries
plundered. A large group of scholars and their dependants was then marched
across the desert to Morocco (Hunwick 1962; Saad 1983). Ahmad Baba later
remarked that his own library was among the smaller ones in the city, and that
even so it had contained a large number of books, most of which were lost.
Ahmad Baba spent years in Marrakesh, where he
taught and wrote and where he was held in high esteem by Moroccan scholars. He
was allowed to return to Timbuktu only after the death of al-Mansur in 1603,
probably in 1608 or 1609, and he died in 1627. The experience of the exile of
Timbuktu's scholars, in Hunwick's reading, was a profound shock to the
intellectual life of the city, though the tradition of scholarship did not
disappear and continued, on a reduced scale, in the following centuries
(Hunwick 1962; Saad 1983).
11.4 The Arma and the
pashalik
The new rulers of the Niger Bend were
soldiers from the Moroccan army and their descendants, known as the Arma, from
the Arabic word for "those who carry the arquebus." For several
decades the pasha of Timbuktu was appointed from Marrakesh, but after the death
of al-Mansur Morocco itself descended into civil war and soon lost control.
From about 1660 the Arma chose their own pashas, and the pashalik became an
essentially autonomous military oligarchy, which married into local society,
adopted local languages and ruled the river towns through a mixture of force
and compromise (Abitbol 1979). The Arma continued to rule Timbuktu until the
early nineteenth century, when they were displaced by the rising power of the
Fulani state of Masina. Meanwhile the Tuareg, Bambara and Fulani carved out
their own spheres of influence in the surrounding country, and the commercial
prosperity of the earlier age was never fully regained.
|
Date |
Event |
|
c. 1009–1010 |
Za Kosoi of the Songhay is said to have
embraced Islam (al-Sa'di) |
|
c. 1325 |
Gao comes under the authority of Mali |
|
1433 |
Tuareg seize Timbuktu |
|
1464 |
Sonni Ali begins his reign |
|
1468 |
Sonni Ali captures Timbuktu |
|
c. 1473 |
Jenne falls to Sonni Ali |
|
1492 |
Death of Sonni Ali |
|
12 April 1493 |
Muhammad Ture defeats Sonni Baru at Anfao;
Askia dynasty begins |
|
1496–1497 |
Askia Muhammad's pilgrimage to Mecca |
|
c. 1500 |
Songhay takes Agadez and Aïr |
|
c. 1516–1517 |
Kebbi breaks away; Songhay authority in Hausaland
collapses |
|
1528 |
Askia Muhammad deposed by his son Musa |
|
1549–1582/3 |
Reign of Askia Daud |
|
1578 |
Battle of the Three Kings; al-Mansur
becomes sultan of Morocco |
|
1588 |
Civil war; Ishaq II becomes Askia |
|
October 1590 |
Judar Pasha leaves Marrakesh |
|
12/13 March 1591 |
Battle of Tondibi |
|
April 1591 |
Moroccans enter Timbuktu |
|
1593–1594 |
Scholars of Timbuktu arrested and deported
to Morocco |
|
1612 |
End of organised Songhay resistance (Kaba) |
Table
2. Selected events in the history of Songhay. Dates are approximate where
indicated (after Hunwick 1999; Kaba 1981, 1984; Gomez 2018).
12. Why Did Songhay Fall?
Competing Explanations
The speed and completeness of the collapse
after Tondibi has invited numerous explanations. None of them is sufficient on
its own, and the best interpretations combine several.
12.1 Military technology
The most obvious explanation is
technological. The Moroccans had firearms and trained men to use them; the
Songhay did not. Arquebuses and light cannon could break the cavalry charges
and the massed infantry on which the Songhay depended, and the stampeding
cattle, the last resort of a force with no answer to guns, show how limited the
options were. Firearms were not unknown in the Sudan, but they were scarce, and
the Songhay lacked the means of acquiring them in quantity. In this sense
Tondibi can be seen as an early episode in the "gunpowder revolution"
that reshaped warfare across Eurasia, and which would later transform many
African conflicts (Austen 2010; Thornton 1998).
Yet technology alone cannot explain the
outcome. A small and distant army, however well armed, could not have conquered
the empire if the empire had been united and secure, and the Moroccan
occupation was never able to extend its authority far beyond the river towns.
The firearms gave Morocco victory in battle, but they did not give it control
over the country.
12.2 Political
fragmentation
The second explanation, which most recent
historians emphasise, is internal political weakness. Succession struggles and
civil wars deprived the empire of experienced commanders, weakened the loyalty
of the provinces and encouraged factions to look outside for support. At the
moment of the invasion, Songhay was an empire in which important regions and
leaders were estranged from the Askia. The civil war of 1588, in particular,
had left the western provinces resentful and the army's leadership divided. In
such conditions the defeat at Tondibi had a much more catastrophic effect than
it would have had on a united state (Hunwick 1999; Kaba 1981).
12.3 Economic and
commercial factors
A third line of interpretation concerns the
empire's economic basis. Songhay's revenues came from the control of trade,
tribute and the labour of dependants, and they were therefore vulnerable to
disruption of the trading routes. There is a traditional argument that the
development of Atlantic trade, following the Portuguese arrival on the Gold
Coast in the 1470s, diverted the gold of the south away from the Sahara and
weakened the commercial basis of the Sudanic empires. This claim has been much
debated; the Sahara trade remained substantial for centuries, and the effect of
Atlantic trade on the Niger Bend was gradual and uneven (Austen 2010; Thornton
1998). It is probably more accurate to say that the empire's reliance on a
small number of cities and routes made it vulnerable to the effects of a shock
at those points, as occurred when the Moroccans seized the towns.
It is also worth noting that the Moroccan
conquest did not give al-Mansur the great wealth he had hoped for. The
goldfields remained beyond his reach, the trade of the river towns declined
under the pressure of occupation and war, and the shipments of gold sent to
Marrakesh were smaller than the sultan had anticipated (Abitbol 1979; El Hamel
2013).
12.4 The ideological
dimension
Finally, some historians have drawn attention
to the ideological dimension of the conflict. Al-Mansur justified the invasion
in religious terms, claiming that he was the legitimate leader of the Islamic
community and that the Songhay rulers had failed to observe the law. Songhay,
in turn, had built its legitimacy on a shared Islamic identity with the
scholars of Timbuktu and the wider Muslim world. The fact that a Muslim kingdom
was invaded by another Muslim kingdom, and that the Moroccans harshly treated
the leading scholars of Timbuktu, divided opinion within the empire. Some
scholars welcomed the invaders, others resisted, and many suffered (Hunwick
1962; Saad 1983).
12.5 A balanced view
Taken together, these explanations suggest
that the empire fell because a series of vulnerabilities coincided: a decisive
technological gap, a divided political elite, an economy dependent on a few
critical points, and an opponent that was both determined and well organised.
Any one of these factors might have been survivable. In combination they were
fatal.
13. Legacy and Memory
13.1 The afterlife of the
empire
The fall of the empire did not mean the
disappearance of Songhay as a people or a culture. The Songhay language
remained, and still remains, widely spoken along the Niger in Mali, Niger and
Burkina Faso. A Songhay state continued in the Dendi region for generations
after Tondibi, and communities across the region maintained their identities
and their traditions (Rouch 1953; Olivier de Sardan 1984). The Arma, the
descendants of the invaders, became a distinctive social group in Timbuktu and
Gao. And the Islamic scholarly tradition continued to flourish, in modified
form, in the towns of the Niger Bend.
13.2 Songhay in historical
imagination
In the twentieth century the Songhay Empire
became a symbol of African achievement. For the generation of nationalist
intellectuals and historians who wrote in the era of decolonisation, it was
evidence of the capacity of African peoples to build sophisticated states and
cultures, and it was incorporated in school curricula and public
commemorations. In the Black diaspora, it came to occupy a place in popular and
scholarly accounts of the African past. These uses of Songhay have sometimes
been criticised for romanticising a society that was also hierarchical,
militaristic and heavily dependent on slavery. A balanced assessment must
recognise both its remarkable achievements and its deep inequalities (Hall
2011; Lovejoy 2012).
13.3 Heritage in the
present
The material and documentary remains of the
empire have gained new significance in recent years. Timbuktu was inscribed on
the World Heritage List in 1988, and the Tomb of Askia in Gao in 2004. In 2012,
during the occupation of northern Mali by armed groups, several of Timbuktu's
historic mausoleums were destroyed, an act for which one of the perpetrators
was later convicted by the International Criminal Court (International Criminal
Court 2016). Thousands of manuscripts were burned in the same period, though
the great majority of the city's manuscript holdings, in the hundreds of
thousands, had been smuggled to safety by local librarians and families (Hammer
2016). These events show that the heritage of Songhay is not merely a matter of
the past but remains contested and precious.
14. Conclusion
The Songhay Empire rose from a modest
riverine kingdom in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries to dominate the
Niger Bend and the trade of the western Sahel. It was the achievement of two
outstanding rulers: Sonni Ali, who combined military daring with an intelligent
use of the river, and Askia Muhammad, who gave the empire an administrative
framework and an Islamic form of legitimacy. Its prosperity rested on commerce,
agriculture and the labour of enslaved people, and its capital cities became
centres of learning and trade of international renown.
Yet the empire was also fragile. It lacked
reliable rules of succession, relied on the loyalty of provincial commanders,
and was dependent on a small number of commercial arteries. When these
weaknesses coincided with the arrival of a technologically superior enemy, the
empire collapsed with astonishing speed. The Moroccan victory at Tondibi was
not the sole cause of the fall, but it was the occasion on which a long
accumulation of internal strains was brutally exposed.
The Songhay story offers several enduring
lessons. It shows that African states were deeply integrated into global
networks of trade, faith and ideas long before the colonial period. It
demonstrates the importance of institutions, as well as of individual rulers,
in sustaining large polities. And it reminds us that historical narratives are
shaped by the sources and perspectives of those who write them: the Songhay we
know is the Songhay of Timbuktu's scholars, and the quest for a fuller picture,
drawing on archaeology, oral tradition and the critical reading of texts,
remains an unfinished task.
References
1.
Abitbol,
Michel. 1979. Tombouctou et les Arma: de la conquête marocaine du Soudan
nigérien en 1591 à l'hégémonie de l'Empire peul du Macina en 1833. Paris:
Maisonneuve et Larose.
2.
Austen,
Ralph A. 2010. Trans-Saharan Africa in World History. New York: Oxford
University Press.
3.
Bovill,
E. W. 1958. The Golden Trade of the Moors. London: Oxford University
Press.
4.
Cissoko,
Sékéné Mody. 1975. Tombouctou et l'empire songhay: épanouissement du Soudan
nigérien aux XVe–XVIe siècles. Dakar: Nouvelles Éditions Africaines.
5.
Cissoko,
Sékéné Mody. 1984. "The Songhay from the 12th to the 16th Century."
In General History of Africa, vol. IV: Africa from the Twelfth to the
Sixteenth Century, edited by D. T. Niane. Paris: UNESCO; London: Heinemann;
Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
El
Hamel, Chouki. 2013. Black Morocco: A History of Slavery, Race, and Islam.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Gomez,
Michael A. 2018. African Dominion: A New History of Empire in Early and
Medieval West Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.
Hall,
Bruce S. 2011. A History of Race in Muslim West Africa, 1600–1960.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Hammer,
Joshua. 2016. The Bad-Ass Librarians of Timbuktu: And Their Race to Save the
World's Most Precious Manuscripts. New York: Simon & Schuster.
10.
Houdas,
Octave, ed. and trans. 1900. Tarikh es-Soudan par Abderrahman ben Abdallah
ben 'Imran ben 'Amir es-Sa'di. Paris: Ernest Leroux.
11.
Houdas,
Octave, and Maurice Delafosse, eds. and trans. 1913. Tarikh el-fettach par
Mahmoud Kati et l'un de ses petit-fils. Paris: Ernest Leroux.
12.
Hunwick,
John O. 1962. "Ahmad Baba and the Moroccan Invasion of the Sudan
(1591)." Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria 2 (3):
311–328.
13.
Hunwick,
John O. 1966. "Religion and State in the Songhay Empire, 1464–1591."
In Islam in Tropical Africa, edited by I. M. Lewis, 296–317. London:
Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.
14.
Hunwick,
John O. 1985a. Shari'a in Songhay: The Replies of al-Maghili to the
Questions of Askia al-Hajj Muhammad. Oxford: Oxford University Press for
the British Academy.
15.
Hunwick,
John O. 1985b. "Al-Maghili and the Jews of Tuwat: The Demise of a
Community." Studia Islamica 61: 155–183.
16.
Hunwick,
John O. 1985c. "Songhay, Bornu and Hausaland in the Sixteenth
Century." In History of West Africa, vol. 1, 3rd ed., edited by J.
F. A. Ajayi and Michael Crowder, 323–371. London: Longman.
17.
Hunwick,
John O. 1996. "Secular Power and Religious Authority in Muslim Society:
The Case of Songhay." Journal of African History 37 (2): 175–194.
18.
Hunwick,
John O. 1999. Timbuktu and the Songhay Empire: Al-Sa'di's Ta'rikh al-Sudan
down to 1613 and Other Contemporary Documents. Leiden: Brill.
19.
Hunwick,
John O. 2000. "Ahmad Baba on Slavery." Sudanic Africa 11:
131–139.
20.
Hunwick,
John O., and Alida Jay Boye. 2008. The Hidden Treasures of Timbuktu:
Historic City of Islamic Africa. London: Thames & Hudson.
21.
Insoll,
Timothy. 1996. Islam, Archaeology and History: Gao Region (Mali) ca. AD
900–1250. Cambridge Monographs in African Archaeology 39; BAR International
Series 647. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum.
22.
Insoll,
Timothy. 2003. The Archaeology of Islam in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
International
Criminal Court. 2016. The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi: Judgment and
Sentence, 27 September 2016, ICC-01/12-01/15.
24.
Kaba,
Lansiné. 1981. "Archers, Musketeers, and Mosquitoes: The Moroccan Invasion
of the Sudan and the Songhay Resistance (1591–1612)." Journal of
African History 22 (4): 457–475.
25.
Kaba,
Lansiné. 1984. "The Pen, the Sword, and the Crown: Islam and Revolution in
Songhay Reconsidered, 1464–1493." Journal of African History 25 (3):
241–256.
26.
Leo
Africanus. 1896. The History and Description of Africa. Translated by
John Pory (1600), edited by Robert Brown. 3 vols. London: Hakluyt Society.
27.
Levtzion,
Nehemia. 1971. "A Seventeenth-Century Chronicle by Ibn al-Mukhtar: A
Critical Study of the Ta'rikh al-fattash." Bulletin of the School of
Oriental and African Studies 34 (3): 571–593.
28.
Levtzion,
Nehemia. 1973. Ancient Ghana and Mali. London: Methuen.
29.
Levtzion,
Nehemia, and J. F. P. Hopkins, eds. 1981. Corpus of Early Arabic Sources for
West African History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Lovejoy,
Paul E. 2012. Transformations in Slavery: A History of Slavery in Africa.
3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
McIntosh,
Roderick J. 1998. The Peoples of the Middle Niger: The Island of Gold.
Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
Moraes
Farias, Paulo F. de. 2003. Arabic Medieval Inscriptions from the Republic of
Mali: Epigraphy, Chronicles and Songhay-Tuareg History. Oxford: Oxford
University Press for the British Academy.
33.
Olivier
de Sardan, Jean-Pierre. 1984. Les sociétés Songhay-Zarma (Niger-Mali):
chefs, esclaves, guerriers, paysans. Paris: Karthala.
34.
Rouch,
Jean. 1953. Contribution à l'histoire des Songhay. Mémoires de l'IFAN
29. Dakar: Institut français d'Afrique noire.
35.
Saad,
Elias N. 1983. Social History of Timbuktu: The Role of Muslim Scholars and
Notables, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Thornton,
John K. 1998. Africa and Africans in the Making of the Atlantic World,
1400–1800. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
UNESCO
World Heritage Centre. 2004. "Tomb of Askia." World Heritage List.
Paris: UNESCO.

Comments
Post a Comment